Back in 2017 we introduced the link structure with an example of a Data Vault model in the banking industry. We showed how the model looks like when a link represents either a relationship or a transaction between two business objects. A link can also connect more than two hubs. Furthermore, there is a special case when a part of the hub references stored in a link can change without describing a different relation. This has a great impact on the link satellites. What is the alternative to the Driving Key implementation in Data Vault 2.0?
Skilled modeling is important to harness the full potential of Data Vault 2.0. To get the most out of the system due to scalability and performance, it also has to be built on an architecture which is completely insert only. On the way into the Data Vault, all update operations can be eliminated and loading processes simplified.
THE COMMON IMPLEMENTATION
A problem that occurs when querying the data out of the Raw Data Vault happens when there are multiple satellites on a hub or a link:
As the events that unfolded during the various financial crises at the start of the century left governments the world over seeking to impose stricter regulations for the financial sector. Banks within the sector were faced with a new task as they sought to continue operating with expansion in mind while still falling well within defined standards. Read More
Focus on trends: Data Lake and no-sql, dwh architecture, self-service bi, modeling and gdpr
All these topics were already covered in Data Vault 2.0 and most of them moved into a higher focus within the last months. Coming with the trends in the private sector, NoSQL databases are now playing an important role for storing data fast from different source systems. This brings new opportunities to analyze the data, but also new challenges, i.e. how to query fast from those “semi”- and “unstructured” data, e.g. including Massive Parallel Processing (MPP). Furthermore, there is an abundance of tools to store, transport, transform and analyze the data, what often results in time and cost-intensive researching. The knowledge about “Schema on Write” and “Schema on Read” (and their differences) became very important to build a Data “Warehouse”. A Schema has been and is still mandatory for Business Analysts when they have to tie the data to business objects for analytical reasons. Storing your data in NoSQL platforms only (let’s call it a “Data Lake”) is a good approach to capture all your company’s data, but it became much more difficult for Business User to get the data out from those platforms. A good and recommended approach is to have both, a Data Lake AND a Data Warehouse combined in a Hybrid Architecture.
Looking beyond Scrum and learn how to increase the value in Data Vault 2.0 projects
Agile transformation is hard because cultural change is hard. It’s not one problem that needs to be solved, but a series of hundreds of decisions affecting lots of people over a long period of time that affects relationships, processes, and even the state of mind of those working within the change.
There are two fundamental visions about what it means to scale agile: Tailoring agile strategies to address the scaling challenges – such as geographic distribution, regulatory compliance, and large team size – faced by development teams and adopting agility across your organization. Both visions are important, but if you can’t successfully perform the former then there is little hope that you’ll be successful at the latter.
The new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a law by the European Union (EU) and became effective on May 25, 2018. This new regulation is designed to put a high level of protection to personal data of European citizens, what means that companies around the world have to establish transparency and ownership to the individuals’ data and need to get a clear declaration of consent from them to save and process their personal data. Though laws from countries outside the EU (especially the USA) tend to favor business over consumer, GDPR affects all companies over the world who have personal data from EU-citizens in their database.
WHAT IS NEW WITH GDPR?
THE CULTURE OF GIVING BACK
“Big Data”, “Data Lake”, “Data Swamp”, “Hybrid Architecture”, “NoSQL”, “Hadoop” … terms you are confronted with very often these days when you are dealing with data. Furthermore, the question comes up if you really need a data warehouse nowadays when you deal with a high variety and volume of data. We want to talk about what a data lake is, if we need a data warehouse when using NoSQL platforms like Hadoop, and how it is combined with Data Vault.
WHAT IS A DATA LAKE?
Last month we talked about a hybrid architecture in Data Vault 2.0, where we explain how to combine structured and unstructured data with a hybrid architecture. To follow up on this topic, we now want to explain how your business users (especially power users) can take a benefit from it with the managed Self-Service Business Intelligence (mSSBI) approach in Data Vault 2.0.
ABOUT SELF-SERVICE BI
Self-service BI allows end-users to completely circumvent IT due to this unresponsiveness of IT. In this approach, business users are left on their own with the whole process of sourcing the data from operational systems, integration and consolidation of the raw data. There are many problems with this self-service approach without the involvement of IT: